Skip to main content

Slashdot: 'I Don't Even Know How To Code': FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried Has Long, Candid Talk With Vlogger

'I Don't Even Know How To Code': FTX's Sam Bankman-Fried Has Long, Candid Talk With Vlogger
Published on November 30, 2022 at 04:33AM
Former FTX head Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) selected cryptocurrency vlogger Tiffany Fong for a series of lengthy and candid telephone interviews. In the two interviews that had been released on YouTube at press time, SBF speaks about many of the major questions connected with the collapse of FTX. CoinTelegraph reports: The first interview was conducted Nov. 6 and released Nov. 29 on YouTube. [...] The recording began with SBF saying, "You don't get into the situation we got in if you, like, make all the right decisions." Taking her cue from that, Fong started her interview by asking about the "backdoor" that allowed SBF "to execute commands that could alter the [FTX] company's financial records without alerting others." SBF expressed surprise at the very idea. "And this is something I would be doing?" he asked. "That I can tell you is definitely not true. I don't even know how to code. [...] I literally never even opened the code for any of FTX." This set the tone for the rest of the conversation, in which Fong politely asked hardball questions and SBF answered with seeming openness. SBF went on to comment on FTX's FTT coin. "I think it had real value. That being said, there are a few problems. [...] This was f*****g embarrassing given my background. [...] I think it was basically more legit than a lot of tokens in some ways. Its was more economically underpinned than the average token was," he said. "Illiquidity didn't cause the crash," SBF continued. Rather, it was "the massive correlation of things during market moves, especially when they are triggered by fear over the position itself." SBF agreed with Fong that "the recovery looks pretty slim" for international customers, while "U.S. is a hundred percent. If its Amazon account had not been turned off, "they could already be withdrawing." Speaking about his political activities, SBF said, "I donated about the same to both parties. [...] All of my Republican donations were dark." [...] In the second, undated, phone interview, SBF addressed the use of FTX customer funds by Alameda Research. Struggling for words, SBF said that he should have thought more about "what a hyper-correlated cross-scenario looks like. It's the oldest game in the book in finance. [...] There was no one person in charge of monitoring risk positions at FTX." Fong pressed for specifics from the situation, with little success. SBF took a moderate position on the role of Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) in the FTX downfall. "Things would certainly be a lot more stable and there would be a lot more ability to generate liquidity [...] and I don't know for sure." Asked about the impact of the collapse of FTX and surrounding scandal on him, SBF said, "I wake up each day and think about what happened, and I have hours per day to ruminate on it. [...] It's different than what it seems to other people."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Slashdot: AT&T Says Leaked Data of 70 Million People Is Not From Its Systems

AT&T Says Leaked Data of 70 Million People Is Not From Its Systems Published on March 20, 2024 at 02:15AM An anonymous reader quotes a report from BleepingComputer: AT&T says a massive trove of data impacting 71 million people did not originate from its systems after a hacker leaked it on a cybercrime forum and claimed it was stolen in a 2021 breach of the company. While BleepingComputer has not been able to confirm the legitimacy of all the data in the database, we have confirmed some of the entries are accurate, including those whose data is not publicly accessible for scraping. The data is from an alleged 2021 AT&T data breach that a threat actor known as ShinyHunters attempted to sell on the RaidForums data theft forum for a starting price of $200,000 and incremental offers of $30,000. The hacker stated they would sell it immediately for $1 million. AT&T told BleepingComputer then that the data did not originate from them and that its systems were not breached. &q

Slashdot: AT&T, T-Mobile Prep First RedCap 5G IoT Devices

AT&T, T-Mobile Prep First RedCap 5G IoT Devices Published on October 15, 2024 at 03:20AM The first 5G Internet of Things (IoT) devices are launching soon. According to Fierce Wireless, T-Mobile plans to launch its first RedCap devices by the end of the year, while AT&T's devices are expected sometime in 2025. From the report: All of this should pave the way for higher performance 5G gadgets to make an impact in the world of IoT. RedCap, which stands for reduced capabilities, was introduced as part of the 3GPP's Release 17 5G standard, which was completed -- or frozen in 3GPP terms -- in mid-2022. The specification, which is also called NR-Light, is the first 5G-specific spec for IoT. RedCap promises to offer data transfer speeds of between 30 Mbps to 80 Mbps. The RedCap spec greatly reduces the bandwidth needed for 5G, allowing the signal to run in a 20 MHz channel rather than the 100 MHz channel required for full scale 5G communications. Read more of this story at

Slashdot: AT&T Can't Hang Up On Landline Phone Customers, California Agency Rules

AT&T Can't Hang Up On Landline Phone Customers, California Agency Rules Published on June 22, 2024 at 01:50AM An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) yesterday rejected AT&T's request to end its landline phone obligations. The state agency also urged AT&T to upgrade copper facilities to fiber instead of trying to shut down the outdated portions of its network. AT&T asked the state to eliminate its Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) obligation, which requires it to provide landline telephone service to any potential customer in its service territory. A CPUC administrative law judge recommended rejection of the application last month, and the commission voted to dismiss AT&T's application with prejudice on Thursday. "Our vote to dismiss AT&T's application made clear that we will protect customer access to basic telephone service... Our rules were designed to provide that assurance,